My studying of photobanks has enough promoted. In particular I have received indirect acknowledgement of that on what read on the Internet - that banks do artificial by create a situation of a favorable mode for those who works with them as with exclusive bank and do artificial limiting those who does not sign for bank "exclusive." Remains actual and a theme of that experts on studying images in photobanks actively take part in contributions and use the position in reduction of a competition. Differently photobanks are not development of the photomarket as propagandize photobanks. These are systems of capture of the photomarket and through quantity and the low price - dictatorship of conditions... Usual monopolization between several players... The difference only in that, in difference from technological monopolies, that on production inevitably conducts a low price level to decrease in a level of idea and execution - it means decrease in the general level of a photo, design, etc. Such " technology of China " for a photo and design. Basically it was interesting to me to study it. And the conclusion is simple - photobanks can be used for " dump of raw material " which practically is not necessary and to develop independently sale of the creative works, photos... The reality is those, that full monopolization of the photomarket is not possible... Always quality () will cost normal () money, and " the cheap consumer goods " has the capacity and similarly to " the Chinese consumer goods " has demand only at for the certain period...