I have recollected one history in one design firm. Some photographer has come to this firm and began to suggest to make photos at the price of in some times below average.Director of this firm who then also has told to me this history, has asked this "photographer": Why at it such low prices?That "photographer" has answered, that it is its way of a competition.Then director of that firm has asked this person - how many years he was trained and got experience in a photo? That "photographer" has told,that more than ten years. And then director has asked its following: " you more than ten years have spent for training in a photo now to come and work for small money? In it there was your purpose to become the photographer? "And director of that firm has asked to not come any more this person to its firm.During our conversation when this director to me told this history,he has told to me (though we with it often argued because of the price for photos - he wished to buy more cheaply, I wished to sell more expensively): "the Person who does not appreciate the work is any more not the person, it animal"...
Training of the photographer - demands a lot of time ... The good equipment costs decent money... I studied photobanks, as one of ways of additional extraction of profit from so-called "doubles" - photos which, as a rule are not used. Basically the similar structure also should be based on this " raw material ". Roughly - has placed what to remove it is not a pity. By this principle I placed photos. This real applicability of photobanks...